Cuticular-hydrocarbon discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis larval karyotypes

G. I. Anyanwu; D. H. Davies; David Molyneux; A. Priestman

doi:10.1080/00034980120112270

Cuticular-hydrocarbon discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis larval karyotypes

G. I. Anyanwu, D. H. Davies, David Molyneux, A. Priestman

University of Jos

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Examination of chromatograms of karyotyped larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis has revealed that there are differences in the profile of their epicuticular hydrocarbons. A discriminant analysis of the quantitative hydrocarbon data has shown that the An. gambiae Mopti 2Rbc/bc karyotype from Mali could be separated from the Forest 2La/a karyotype from Liberia in >80% of cases. Similar analysis permitted >80% separation of individuals of two karyotypes of Anopheles arabiensis: 2Rab/+ from Burkina Faso, and 2Rb/b from Madagascar.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	843-852
Number of pages	10
Journal	Pathogens and Global Health
Volume	95
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00034980120112270
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2001
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1080/00034980120112270

Cite this

@article{f3a9a5ff675e4b9f971c740cc4a6f4cc,

title = "Cuticular-hydrocarbon discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis larval karyotypes",

abstract = "Examination of chromatograms of karyotyped larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis has revealed that there are differences in the profile of their epicuticular hydrocarbons. A discriminant analysis of the quantitative hydrocarbon data has shown that the An. gambiae Mopti 2Rbc/bc karyotype from Mali could be separated from the Forest 2La/a karyotype from Liberia in >80\% of cases. Similar analysis permitted >80\% separation of individuals of two karyotypes of Anopheles arabiensis: 2Rab/+ from Burkina Faso, and 2Rb/b from Madagascar.",

author = "Anyanwu, \{G. I.\} and Davies, \{D. H.\} and David Molyneux and A. Priestman",

year = "2001",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/00034980120112270",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "843--852",

journal = "Pathogens and Global Health",

issn = "2047-7724",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cuticular-hydrocarbon discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis larval karyotypes

AU - Anyanwu, G. I.

AU - Davies, D. H.

AU - Molyneux, David

AU - Priestman, A.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Examination of chromatograms of karyotyped larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis has revealed that there are differences in the profile of their epicuticular hydrocarbons. A discriminant analysis of the quantitative hydrocarbon data has shown that the An. gambiae Mopti 2Rbc/bc karyotype from Mali could be separated from the Forest 2La/a karyotype from Liberia in >80% of cases. Similar analysis permitted >80% separation of individuals of two karyotypes of Anopheles arabiensis: 2Rab/+ from Burkina Faso, and 2Rb/b from Madagascar.

AB - Examination of chromatograms of karyotyped larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis has revealed that there are differences in the profile of their epicuticular hydrocarbons. A discriminant analysis of the quantitative hydrocarbon data has shown that the An. gambiae Mopti 2Rbc/bc karyotype from Mali could be separated from the Forest 2La/a karyotype from Liberia in >80% of cases. Similar analysis permitted >80% separation of individuals of two karyotypes of Anopheles arabiensis: 2Rab/+ from Burkina Faso, and 2Rb/b from Madagascar.

U2 - 10.1080/00034980120112270

DO - 10.1080/00034980120112270

M3 - Article

SN - 2047-7724

VL - 95

SP - 843

EP - 852

JO - Pathogens and Global Health

JF - Pathogens and Global Health

IS - 8

ER -

Cuticular-hydrocarbon discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis larval karyotypes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this