Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: impacts on vulnerable populations and sustaining home-grown solutions: impacts on vulnerable populations and sustaining home-grown solutions

  • Lauren J. Wallace
  • , Elysée Nouvet
  • , Robert Bortolussi
  • , Joshua A. Arthur
  • , Eugenia Amporfu
  • , Eric Arthur
  • , Kofi Bobi Barimah
  • , Bernard Aristide Bitouga
  • , Harriet Chemusto
  • , Joseph Ikechebelu
  • , Ngozi Joe-Ikechebelu
  • , Mandy Kader Kondé
  • , Jean Damascene Kabakambira
  • , Gabriel Kyomba Kalombe
  • , Diana M.S. Karanja
  • , Eveline Thobias Konje
  • , Sekou Kouyate
  • , Gojjam Limeneh
  • , Felicien Munday Mulopo
  • , Mary Ndu
  • Eric Ochomo, Oriokot Francis, Oumy Thiongane, Jeremiah Seni, S. Mohammed Sheriff, Douglas Singini
  • Ghana Health Service
  • Western University
  • Dalhousie University
  • Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
  • Centre for Plant Medicine Research
  • Université de Douala
  • Mildmay Uganda
  • Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka
  • University of Victoria BC
  • la Fondation Santé & Développement Durable (FOSAD)
  • University of Rwanda
  • Université de Kinshasa
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • Général Lansana Conté University Sonfonia
  • Gondar University
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Liberia College of Physicians and Surgeons
  • Limulunga District Health Office

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary draws on sub-Saharan African health researchers’ accounts of their countries’ responses to control the spread of COVID-19, including social and health impacts, home-grown solutions, and gaps in knowledge. Limited human and material resources for infection control and lack of understanding or appreciation by the government of the realities of vulnerable populations have contributed to failed interventions to curb transmission, and further deepened inequalities. Some governments have adapted or limited lockdowns due to the negative impacts on livelihoods and taken specific measures to minimize the impact on the most vulnerable citizens. However, these measures may not reach the majority of the poor. Yet, African countries’ responses to COVID-19 have also included a range of innovations, including diversification of local businesses to produce personal protective equipment, disinfectants, test kits, etc., which may expand domestic manufacturing capabilities and deepen self-reliance. African and high-income governments, donors, non-governmental organizations, and businesses should work to strengthen existing health system capacity and back African-led business. Social scientific understandings of public perceptions, their interactions with COVID-19 control measures, and studies on promising clinical interventions are needed. However, a decolonizing response to COVID-19 must include explicit and meaningful commitments to sharing the power—the authority and resources—to study and endorse solutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-653
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Public Health
Volume111
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Decolonization
  • Equity
  • Global health
  • Infectious disease
  • Sub-Saharan Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: impacts on vulnerable populations and sustaining home-grown solutions: impacts on vulnerable populations and sustaining home-grown solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this