Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

Tina Lavender; Carol Kingdon; Anna Hart; Gill Gyte; Mark Gabbay; James P. Neilson

doi:10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

Tina Lavender
, Carol Kingdon
, Anna Hart
, Gill Gyte
, Mark Gabbay
, James P. Neilson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	490-491
Number of pages	2
Journal	BMJ
Volume	331
Issue number	7515
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a
Publication status	Published - 3 Sept 2005
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

Cite this

@article{8dad47d0430341508b2530503a259312,

title = "Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery",

author = "Tina Lavender and Carol Kingdon and Anna Hart and Gill Gyte and Mark Gabbay and Neilson, \{James P.\}",

year = "2005",

month = sep,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a",

language = "English",

volume = "331",

pages = "490--491",

journal = "BMJ",

issn = "0959-8146",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7515",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

AU - Lavender, Tina

AU - Kingdon, Carol

AU - Hart, Anna

AU - Gyte, Gill

AU - Gabbay, Mark

AU - Neilson, James P.

PY - 2005/9/3

Y1 - 2005/9/3

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

DO - 10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

M3 - Review article

SN - 0959-8146

VL - 331

SP - 490

EP - 491

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

IS - 7515

ER -