Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

Tina Lavender; Carol Kingdon; Anna Hart; Gill Gyte; Mark Gabbay; James P. Neilson

doi:10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

Tina Lavender, Carol Kingdon, Anna Hart, Gill Gyte, Mark Gabbay, James P. Neilson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	490-491
Number of pages	2
Journal	BMJ
Volume	331
Issue number	7515
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a
Publication status	Published - 3 Sept 2005
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

Cite this

@article{8dad47d0430341508b2530503a259312,

title = "Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery",

author = "Tina Lavender and Carol Kingdon and Anna Hart and Gill Gyte and Mark Gabbay and Neilson, \{James P.\}",

year = "2005",

month = sep,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a",

language = "English",

volume = "331",

pages = "490--491",

journal = "BMJ",

issn = "0959-8146",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7515",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

AU - Lavender, Tina

AU - Kingdon, Carol

AU - Hart, Anna

AU - Gyte, Gill

AU - Gabbay, Mark

AU - Neilson, James P.

PY - 2005/9/3

Y1 - 2005/9/3

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

DO - 10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3a

M3 - Review article

SN - 0959-8146

VL - 331

SP - 490

EP - 491

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

IS - 7515

ER -