Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

Christopher G. Fawsitt, Peter Vickerman, Graham S. Cooke, Eleanor Barnes, Jonathan Ball, Diana Brainard, Gary Burgess, John Dillon, Graham Foster, Charles Gore, Neil Guha, Rachel Halford, Kevin Whitby, Chris Holmes, Anita Howe, Emma Hudson, Sharon Hutchinson, William Irving, Salim Khakoo, Paul KlenermanNatasha Martin, Benedetta Massetto, Tamyo Mbisa, John McHutchison, Jane McKeating, John McLauchlan, Alec Miners, Andrea Murray, Peter Shaw, Peter Simmonds, Chris Spencer, Emma Thomson, Nicole Zitzmann, Nicky J. Welton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 12 weeks of treatment produces cure rates greater than 95%. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5A resistance at baseline and optimizing treatment duration accordingly in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-analytic model compared (1) standard 12-week treatment (no testing), (2) shortened 8-week treatment (no testing), and (3) baseline testing with 12-/8-week treatment for those with/without NS5A polymorphisms. Patients who failed first-line therapy were retreated for 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and the probability of cost-effectiveness were calculated. Results: Baseline testing had an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of £11 838 versus standard 12 weeks of therapy (no testing) and low probability (31%) of being the most cost-effective, assuming £30 000 willingness to pay. Shortened 8 weeks of treatment (no testing) had an INMB of £12 294 and the highest probability (69%) of being most cost-effective. Scenario analyses showed baseline testing generally had the highest INMB and probability of being most cost-effective if first- and second-line drug prices were low (<£20k). Conclusions: Optimizing treatment duration based on NS5A polymorphisms for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients in the United Kingdom is not cost-effective if the drug costs are high; the strategy is generally most cost-effective when drug prices are low (<£20k).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-190
Number of pages11
JournalValue in Health
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Keywords

  • baseline testing
  • cost-effectiveness
  • hepatitis C virus
  • resistance-associated polymorphisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this