Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique

Elanor Lian Mary Gomersall, Lowell Ling, Konrad Reinhart, Victoria Bion, Abeselom Ekesh, Christiana Adu-Takyi, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Paulin Ruhato Banguti, Jonathan Cohen, Janet Victoria Diaz, Bin Du, David M. Goldfarb, Luis Antonio Gorordo-Delsol, Colin Alexander Graham, Ricardo Iramain, Shevin Jacob, Zsuzsoka Kecskes, Niranjan Kissoon, Jeffrey Lipman, Ganbold LundegKathryn Maitland, Kamal Osman Mergani, Christopher Moschides, Miriam Nakalembe, Ikenna Kingsley Ndu, Jolene Oon, Trina Sale, Ashis Shresthra, Simon Stockley, Daniel Talmor, Audrey Bree Tse, Anand Zachariah, Gavin Matthew Joynt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition which may arise from infection in any organ system and requires early recognition and management. Healthcare professionals working in any specialty may need to manage patients with sepsis. Educating medical students about this condition may be an effective way to ensure all future doctors have sufficient ability to diagnose and treat septic patients. However, there is currently no consensus on what competencies medical students should achieve regarding sepsis recognition and treatment. This study aims to outline what sepsis-related competencies medical students should achieve by the end of their medical student training in both high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions and in low or lower-middle income countries/regions.

Methods: Two separate panels from high or upper-middle income and low or lower-middle income countries/regions participated in a Delphi method to suggest and rank sepsis competencies for medical students. Each panel consisted of 13–18 key stakeholders of medical education and doctors in specialties where sepsis is a common problem (both specialists and trainees). Panelists came from all continents, except Antarctica.

Results: The panels reached consensus on 38 essential sepsis competencies in low or lower-middle income countries/regions and 33 in high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions. These include competencies such as definition of sepsis and septic shock and urgency of antibiotic treatment. In the low or lower-middle income countries/regions group, consensus was also achieved for competencies ranked as very important, and was achieved in 4/5 competencies rated as moderately important. In the high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions group, consensus was achieved in 41/57 competencies rated as very important but only 6/11 competencies rated as moderately important.

Conclusion: Medical schools should consider developing curricula to address essential competencies, as a minimum, but also consider addressing competencies rated as very or moderately important.

Original languageEnglish
Article number653
Pages (from-to)e653
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Competency
  • Curriculum
  • Education
  • Medical students
  • Septic shock
  • Severe sepsis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this