Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach: overview of the Core GRADE approach

  • Gordon Guyatt
  • , Thomas Agoritsas
  • , Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , Jamie Rylance
  • , Farid Foroutan
  • , Manya Prasad
  • , Arnav Agarwal
  • , Hans De Beer
  • , M. Hassan Murad
  • , Stefan Schandelmaier
  • , Alfonso Iorio
  • , Liang Yao
  • , Roman Jaeschke
  • , Per Olav Vandvik
  • , Linan Zeng
  • , Sameer Parpia
  • , Rohan D'souza
  • , David Rind
  • , Derek K. Chu
  • Prashanti Eachempati, Kameshwar Prasad, Monica Hultcrantz, Victor M. Montori
  • McMaster University
  • The Magic Evidence Ecosystem Foundation
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Toronto
  • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
  • Guide2Guidance
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Basel
  • University College Cork
  • University of Pecs
  • Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine
  • University of Oslo
  • West China Second University Hospital
  • Sichuan University
  • Institute for Clinical and Economic Review
  • Harvard University
  • University of Plymouth
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • Fortis CSR Foundation
  • Region Stockholm
  • Karolinska Institutet

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This first article in a seven part series presents an overview of the essential elements of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach that has proved extremely useful in systematic reviews, health technology assessment reports, and clinical practice guidelines. GRADE guidance has appeared in many articles dealing with both core issues and more specialised and complex guidance, and it has evolved over time. This series of articles presents GRADE essentials, Core GRADE, focusing on the core judgments necessary to summarise the comparative evidence about alternative care options and to make recommendations that apply to the care of individual patients. This article presents detailed guidance on formulating questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) structure, and refining the question considering possible differences in relative and absolute effects across patient groups. The article then provides an overview of the remainder of the Core GRADE approach, including decisions about the certainty of the evidence and considerations in moving from evidence to guidance and recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere081903
JournalBMJ
Volume389
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach: overview of the Core GRADE approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this