Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Core Competencies for Scientific Editors of Biomedical Journals: Consensus Statement

  • David Moher
  • , James Galipeau
  • , Sabina Alam
  • , Virginia Barbour
  • , Kidist Bartolomeos
  • , Patricia Baskin
  • , Sally Bell-Syer
  • , Kelly D. Cobey
  • , Leighton Chan
  • , Jocalyn Clark
  • , Jonathan Deeks
  • , Annette Flanagin
  • , Paul Garner
  • , Anne Marie Glenny
  • , Trish Groves
  • , Kurinchi Gurusamy
  • , Farrokh Habibzadeh
  • , Stefanie Jewell-Thomas
  • , Diane Kelsall
  • , José Florencio Lapeña
  • Harriet MacLehose, Ana Marusic, Joanne E. McKenzie, Jay Shah, Larissa Shamseer, Sharon Straus, Peter Tugwell, Elizabeth Wager, Margaret Winker, Getu Zhaori
  • University of Ottawa
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • World Health Organization
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • Council of Science Editors
  • University of York
  • Cochrane Central Executive Team
  • University of Stirling
  • American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • The Lancet
  • University of Birmingham
  • American Medical Association
  • University of Manchester
  • BMJ
  • University College London
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • Petroleum Industry Health Organization
  • World Association of Medical Editors
  • Elsevier
  • Canadian Medical Association
  • University of the Philippines
  • Philippine Association of Medical Journal Editors (PAMJE)
  • Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME)
  • Cochrane Editorial Unit
  • University of Split
  • European Association of Science Editors
  • Monash University
  • Patan Hospital
  • Patan Academy of Health Sciences
  • Nepal Association of Medical Editors
  • University of Toronto
  • Sideview

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Scientific editors are responsible for deciding which articles to publish in their journals. However, we have not found documentation of their required knowledge, skills, and characteristics, nor the existence of any formal core competencies for this role.

Methods: We describe the development of a minimum set of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.

Results: The 14 key core competencies are divided into three major areas and each competency has a list of associated elements or descriptions of more specific knowledge, skills, and characteristics that contribute to its fulfilment.

Conclusion: We believe that these core competencies are a baseline of the knowledge, skills, and characteristics needed to perform competently the duties of a scientific editor at a biomedical journal.

Original languageEnglish
Article number167
Pages (from-to)e167
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date11 Sept 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Biomedical journal
  • Core competencies
  • Delphi
  • Editor role
  • Expert consensus
  • Scientific editor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core Competencies for Scientific Editors of Biomedical Journals: Consensus Statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this