Connecting the dots: Using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction: Using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction

Elena Zaitseva, Clare Milsom, Martyn Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study utilised concept mapping software to aid interpretation of the qualitative data from student satisfaction surveys. The analysis revealed differences in student priorities and attitudes across the three years of an undergraduate degree. First-year students were more concerned with social and academic integration and demonstrated an emotional response to their engagement with higher education. Comments from second-year students indicated an emphasis on academic progress and development, while final-year students were focused on achievement-oriented learning. Critical aspects of the student experience hidden between survey questions were also revealed. The paper discusses the implications of the findings for understanding the changing interaction between different aspects of student experience and satisfaction. It concludes with suggestions on how this approach to analysis might benefit the work of quality assurance teams and academic developers in other institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-247
Number of pages23
JournalQuality in Higher Education
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • academic enhancement
  • concept mapping
  • higher education
  • open text comments
  • quality enhancement
  • semantic analysis
  • student satisfaction
  • student survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting the dots: Using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction: Using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this