Conflict and catastrophe-related severe burn injuries: A challenging setting for antimicrobial decision-making.

Scott Jc Pallett, Rakhee Mistry, Zoe L Lambert, Stephen Woolley, Aula Abbara, Aodhan O Breathnach, Lucy E Lamb, Andrew Williams, Nabeela Mughal, Olena Moshynets, Stephen J Hughes, Matthew K O'Shea, Luke Sp Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Severe burns are a major component of conflict-related injuries and can result in high rates of mortality. Conflict and disaster-related severe burn injuries present unique challenges in logistic, diagnostic and treatment options, while wider conflict is associated with driving local antimicrobial resistance. We present a targeted review of available literature over the last 10 years on the use of systemic antimicrobial antibiotics in this setting and, given limited available data, provide an expert consensus discussion. While international guidelines do not tend to recommend routine use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, the challenges of conflict settings and potential for polytrauma are likely to have ongoing impacts on antimicrobial decision-making and use. Efforts must be made to develop a suitable evidence base in this unique setting. In the interim, a pragmatic approach to balancing selective pressures of antimicrobial use with realistic access is possible.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106224
Pages (from-to)106224
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume89
Issue number3
Early online date8 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Antimicrobial stewardship
  • Conflict
  • Disaster medicine
  • Multidrug resistance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conflict and catastrophe-related severe burn injuries: A challenging setting for antimicrobial decision-making.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this