Comparison of Two Genotyping Methods for Distinguishing Recrudescence from Reinfection in Antimalarial Drug Efficacy/Effectiveness Trials.

Joseph R.M. Fulakeza, Rachel L. Banda, Trancizeo R. Lipenga, Anja Terlouw, Standwell C. Nkhoma, Eva Maria Hodel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genotyping of allelic variants of merozoite surface proteins 1 and 2 ( and ), and the glutamate-rich protein is the gold standard for distinguishing reinfections from recrudescences in antimalarial drug trials. We compared performance of the recently developed 24-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Barcoding Assay against and genotyping in a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Malawi. Rates of recrudescence and reinfection estimated by the two methods did not differ significantly (Fisher's exact test; = 0.887 and = 0.768, respectively). There was a strong agreement between the two methods in predicting treatment outcomes and resolving the genetic complexity of malaria infections in this setting. These results support the use of this SNP assay as an alternative method for correcting antimalarial efficacy/effectiveness data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-86
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume99
Issue number1
Early online date21 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Two Genotyping Methods for Distinguishing Recrudescence from Reinfection in Antimalarial Drug Efficacy/Effectiveness Trials.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this