Comparison and standardisation of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in bovines

D. von Blumroder, G. Schares, R. Norton, Diana J.L. Williams, I. Esteban-Redondo, S. Wright, C. Bjorkman, J. Frossling, V. Risco-Castillo, A. Fernandez-Garcia, L. M. Ortega-Mora, H. Sager, A. Hemphill, C. van Maanen, W. Wouda, F. J. Conraths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various existing serological tests were compared with a standard panel of 523 sera in a multicentred study across Europe. Well characterised sera from animals that were experimentally or naturally infected with Neospora caninum as well as sera from cattle deemed uninfected with N. caninum were provided by the participants of the study and analysed in several commercial (CHEKIT(R) Dr. Bommeli/Intervet, CIVTESTTM BOVIS NEOSPORA Hipra, Cypress Diagnostics C.V., Herd Check((R)) IDEXX, Mastazyme(TM) MAST Diagnostics, P38-ELISA Animal Welfare and Food Safety GmbH (AFOSA)) as well as in-house assays (five ELISAs and one IFAT). Most tests showed a high level of agreement in the interpretation of the test results (positive or negative). A further distinct increase in agreement between tests was obtained after the application of standardised cut-offs offered by a two-graph receiver operating characteristic analysis. This procedure allows a standardised interpretation of results obtained with different tests used in independent, parallel seroepidemiological studies. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-22
Number of pages12
JournalVeterinary Parasitology
Volume120
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2004

Keywords

  • Cut-off
  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
  • Indirect fluorescent antibody test
  • Neospora caninum
  • Test standardisation
  • TG-ROC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison and standardisation of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in bovines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this