Comparative performance evaluation of blood film microscopy for the diagnosis of bovine trypanosomosis by some laboratories in North-central Nigeria

  • Jones Soladoye Akinbobola
  • , Solomon Oluwole Okaiyeto
  • , Anthony Kojo Sackey
  • , Lushaikyaa Allam
  • , Bisalla Mohammed
  • , Jerome Nyhalah Dinga
  • , Prosper C. Chukwuemeka
  • , Lucas Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background:

Due to its affordability in disease-affected communities and suitability for field application, microscopy has historically been considered the gold standard for field diagnosis of trypanosomosis in rural settings.

Aim:

This works aims to compare the performance of microscopists on bovine trypanosome microscopy by organizing the first comparative assessment on a correct reading of slides by laboratory professionals using the read slide results and a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire in North-central Nigeria.

Methods:

Ten participants were addressed, as they were sent a panel of two slides (Slide 1: No Trypanosome present; Slide 2: Trypanosome present) and a questionnaire.

Results:

All participants greater than 41 years old reported correctly the presence and absence of parasites on slides. Only 3/8 of microscopists from routine diagnostic laboratories reported correctly the presence of the parasite.

Conclusion:

Our study confirmed errors in reading slides. Therefore, training of microscopists besides a nationwide quality assessment is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-603
Number of pages5
JournalOpen Veterinary Journal
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2023

Keywords

  • Blood film microscopy
  • Bovine trypanosomosis
  • Evaluation
  • North-central Nigeria
  • Performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative performance evaluation of blood film microscopy for the diagnosis of bovine trypanosomosis by some laboratories in North-central Nigeria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this