Abstract
Background:
Due to its affordability in disease-affected communities and suitability for field application, microscopy has historically been considered the gold standard for field diagnosis of trypanosomosis in rural settings.
Aim:
This works aims to compare the performance of microscopists on bovine trypanosome microscopy by organizing the first comparative assessment on a correct reading of slides by laboratory professionals using the read slide results and a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire in North-central Nigeria.
Methods:
Ten participants were addressed, as they were sent a panel of two slides (Slide 1: No Trypanosome present; Slide 2: Trypanosome present) and a questionnaire.
Results:
All participants greater than 41 years old reported correctly the presence and absence of parasites on slides. Only 3/8 of microscopists from routine diagnostic laboratories reported correctly the presence of the parasite.
Conclusion:
Our study confirmed errors in reading slides. Therefore, training of microscopists besides a nationwide quality assessment is recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 599-603 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Open Veterinary Journal |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 May 2023 |
Keywords
- Blood film microscopy
- Bovine trypanosomosis
- Evaluation
- North-central Nigeria
- Performance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative performance evaluation of blood film microscopy for the diagnosis of bovine trypanosomosis by some laboratories in North-central Nigeria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver