Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Joerg J. Meerpohl; Celeste E. Naude; Paul Garner; Reem A. Mustafa; Holger J. Schünemann

doi:10.3945/an.117.016188

Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Joerg J. Meerpohl
, Celeste E. Naude
, Paul Garner
, Reem A. Mustafa
, Holger J. Schünemann

Clinical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We read the perspective article “NutriGrade: A Scoring system to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research” published in November 2016 in Advances in Nutrition [1]. We agree it is important to assess the trustworthiness of evidence.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	789-790
Number of pages	2
Journal	Advances in Nutrition
Volume	8
Issue number	5
Early online date	7 Sept 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3945/an.117.016188
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 7 Sept 2017

Access to Document

10.3945/an.117.016188

Comment re Perspective NutriGradeAccepted author manuscript, 41 KB

Cite this

@article{39776dd3832545a190cf1b0f4b3311da,

title = "Comment on {"}Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research{"}",

abstract = "We read the perspective article “NutriGrade: A Scoring system to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research” published in November 2016 in Advances in Nutrition [1]. We agree it is important to assess the trustworthiness of evidence.",

author = "Meerpohl, \{Joerg J.\} and Naude, \{Celeste E.\} and Paul Garner and Mustafa, \{Reem A.\} and Sch{\"u}nemann, \{Holger J.\}",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

day = "7",

doi = "10.3945/an.117.016188",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "789--790",

journal = "Advances in Nutrition",

issn = "2161-8313",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

AU - Meerpohl, Joerg J.

AU - Naude, Celeste E.

AU - Garner, Paul

AU - Mustafa, Reem A.

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

PY - 2017/9/7

Y1 - 2017/9/7

N2 - We read the perspective article “NutriGrade: A Scoring system to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research” published in November 2016 in Advances in Nutrition [1]. We agree it is important to assess the trustworthiness of evidence.

AB - We read the perspective article “NutriGrade: A Scoring system to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research” published in November 2016 in Advances in Nutrition [1]. We agree it is important to assess the trustworthiness of evidence.

U2 - 10.3945/an.117.016188

DO - 10.3945/an.117.016188

M3 - Letter

SN - 2161-8313

VL - 8

SP - 789

EP - 790

JO - Advances in Nutrition

JF - Advances in Nutrition

IS - 5

ER -

Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this