Coercing for public health: reflections on the role of coercion in public health emergencies: reflections on the role of coercion in public health emergencies

Safura Abdool Karim, Maxwell J. Smith, Diego S. Silva, Marlyn Faure, Liana Woskie, Deborah Nyirenda, Cai Heath, Vittoria Porta, Jeffery Jones, Sadie Regmi, MacKenzie Isaac, Jonathan Shaffer, Tess Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The workshop, Coercing for Health: Transdisciplinary Approaches to the Ethics of Coercive Public Health Policies was held at the University of Oxford on July 3rd and 4th, 2024. This paper provides both a summary of the workshop proceedings and reflections and directions for future research on coercive public health measures. The workshop consisted of four key parts: defining coercion; history and legal analysis of coercion; public health ethics perspectives on coercion; experiences of coercive public health measures. According to our reflections, some important questions remaining for further research include: what is the difference between coercion and enforcement? Who gets to define and address coercion? How do structural factors affect health and experiences of coercion? We encourage others to continue to work on this important area, to ensure the ethically acceptable and thoughtful implementation of any future coercive measures in the sphere of public health.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMonash Bioethics Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coercion
  • Ethics
  • Law
  • Police power
  • Public health policy
  • Restrictive measures
  • Sociology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coercing for public health: reflections on the role of coercion in public health emergencies: reflections on the role of coercion in public health emergencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this