Cluster designs to assess the prevalence of acute malnutrition by lot quality assurance sampling: a validation study by computer simulation

Casey Olives, Marcello Pagano, Megan Deitchler, Bethany L. Hedt, Kari Egge, Joseph Valadez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) methods require simple random sampling to guarantee valid results. However, cluster sampling has been proposed to reduce the number of random starting points. This study uses simulations to examine the classification error of two such designs, a 67x3 (67 clusters of three observations) and a 33x6 (33 clusters of six observations) sampling scheme to assess the prevalence of global acute malnutrition (GAM). Further, we explore the use of a 67x3 sequential sampling scheme for LQAS classification of GAM prevalence. Results indicate that, for independent clusters with moderate intracluster correlation for the GAM outcome, the three sampling designs maintain approximate validity for LQAS analysis. Sequential sampling can substantially reduce the average sample size that is required for data collection. The presence of intercluster correlation can impact dramatically the classification error that is associated with LQAS analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-510
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
Volume172
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2009

Keywords

  • Acute malnutrition
  • Emergency
  • Lot quality assurance sampling
  • Sequential sampling
  • Wasting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cluster designs to assess the prevalence of acute malnutrition by lot quality assurance sampling: a validation study by computer simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this