TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical handover communication at maternity shift changes and women's safety in Banjul, the Gambia: a mixed-methods study: a mixed-methods study
AU - Rickard, Faith
AU - Lu, Fides
AU - Gustafsson, Lotta
AU - MacArthur, Christine
AU - Cummins, Carole
AU - Coker, Ivan
AU - Wilson, Amie
AU - Mane, Kebba
AU - Manneh, Kebba
AU - Manaseki-Holland, Semira
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Background: Clinical handover is a vital communication process for patient safety; transferring patient responsibility between healthcare professionals (HCPs). Exploring handover processes in maternity care is fundamental for service quality, addressing continuity of care and maternal mortality. Methods: This mixed-methods study was conducted in all three maternity hospitals in Banjul, The Gambia. Shift-to-shift maternity handovers were observed and compared against a standard investigating content and environment. Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with doctors, midwives and nurses explored handover experience. Results: One hundred ten nurse/midwife shift-to-shift handovers were observed across all shift times and maternity wards; only 666 of 845 women (79%) were handed over. Doctors had no scheduled handover. Shift-leads alone gave/received handover, delayed [median 35 min, IQR 24–45] 82% of the time; 96% of handovers were not confidential and 29% were disrupted. Standardised guidelines and training were lacking. A median 6 of 28 topics [IQR 5–9] were communicated per woman. Information varied significantly by time, high-risk classification and location. For women in labour, 10 [IQR 8–14] items were handed-over, 8 [IQR 5–11] for women classed ‘high-risk’, 5 [IQR 4–7] for ante/postnatal women (p < 0.001); > 50% had no care management plan communicated. Twenty-one interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Facilitators and barriers to effective handover surrounding three health service factors emerged; health systems (e.g. absence of formalised handover training), organisation culture (e.g. absence of multidisciplinary team handover) and individual clinician factors (e.g. practical barriers such as transportation difficulties in getting to work). Conclusion: Maternity handover was inconsistent, hindered by contextual barriers including lack of team communication and guidelines, delays, with some women omitted entirely. Findings alongside HCPs views demonstrate feasible opportunities for enhancing handover, thereby improving women's safety.
AB - Background: Clinical handover is a vital communication process for patient safety; transferring patient responsibility between healthcare professionals (HCPs). Exploring handover processes in maternity care is fundamental for service quality, addressing continuity of care and maternal mortality. Methods: This mixed-methods study was conducted in all three maternity hospitals in Banjul, The Gambia. Shift-to-shift maternity handovers were observed and compared against a standard investigating content and environment. Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with doctors, midwives and nurses explored handover experience. Results: One hundred ten nurse/midwife shift-to-shift handovers were observed across all shift times and maternity wards; only 666 of 845 women (79%) were handed over. Doctors had no scheduled handover. Shift-leads alone gave/received handover, delayed [median 35 min, IQR 24–45] 82% of the time; 96% of handovers were not confidential and 29% were disrupted. Standardised guidelines and training were lacking. A median 6 of 28 topics [IQR 5–9] were communicated per woman. Information varied significantly by time, high-risk classification and location. For women in labour, 10 [IQR 8–14] items were handed-over, 8 [IQR 5–11] for women classed ‘high-risk’, 5 [IQR 4–7] for ante/postnatal women (p < 0.001); > 50% had no care management plan communicated. Twenty-one interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Facilitators and barriers to effective handover surrounding three health service factors emerged; health systems (e.g. absence of formalised handover training), organisation culture (e.g. absence of multidisciplinary team handover) and individual clinician factors (e.g. practical barriers such as transportation difficulties in getting to work). Conclusion: Maternity handover was inconsistent, hindered by contextual barriers including lack of team communication and guidelines, delays, with some women omitted entirely. Findings alongside HCPs views demonstrate feasible opportunities for enhancing handover, thereby improving women's safety.
KW - communication
KW - Handover
KW - maternity
KW - quality improvement
KW - safety
U2 - 10.1186/s12884-022-05052-9
DO - 10.1186/s12884-022-05052-9
M3 - Article
SN - 1471-2393
VL - 22
JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
IS - 1
M1 - 784
ER -