Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: A concept paper from the GRADE Public Health Group

  • Michele Hilton Boon
  • , Hilary Thomson
  • , Beth Shaw
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Stefan K. Lhachimi
  • , Jesús López-Alcalde
  • , Miloslav Klugar
  • , Leslie Choi
  • , Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , Miranda W. Langendam
  • , Olivia Crane
  • , Rebecca L. Morgan
  • , Eva Rehfuess
  • , Bradley C. Johnston
  • , Lee Yee Chong
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
  • University of Glasgow
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • McMaster University
  • American University of Beirut
  • University of Bremen
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Masaryk University
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City
  • University of Amsterdam
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Texas A&M University
  • University of Oxford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective

This paper explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.

Study Design and Setting

We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept paper through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.

Results

Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritising health and ‘non-health’ outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including non-randomised studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision-makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology, and provide solutions.

Conclusion

The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-53
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume135
Early online date18 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • GRADE
  • Guidelines
  • Health policy
  • Nonrandomized studies
  • Public health
  • Social determinants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: A concept paper from the GRADE Public Health Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this