TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: A concept paper from the GRADE Public Health Group
AU - Hilton Boon, Michele
AU - Thomson, Hilary
AU - Shaw, Beth
AU - Akl, Elie A.
AU - Lhachimi, Stefan K.
AU - López-Alcalde, Jesús
AU - Klugar, Miloslav
AU - Choi, Leslie
AU - Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika
AU - Mustafa, Reem A.
AU - Langendam, Miranda W.
AU - Crane, Olivia
AU - Morgan, Rebecca L.
AU - Rehfuess, Eva
AU - Johnston, Bradley C.
AU - Chong, Lee Yee
AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.
AU - Schünemann, Holger J.
AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - ObjectiveThis paper explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.Study Design and SettingWe convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept paper through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.ResultsFive priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritising health and ‘non-health’ outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including non-randomised studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision-makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology, and provide solutions.ConclusionThe GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.
AB - ObjectiveThis paper explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.Study Design and SettingWe convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept paper through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.ResultsFive priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritising health and ‘non-health’ outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including non-randomised studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision-makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology, and provide solutions.ConclusionThe GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.
KW - GRADE
KW - Guidelines
KW - Health policy
KW - Nonrandomized studies
KW - Public health
KW - Social determinants
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 135
SP - 42
EP - 53
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -
