Canine visceral leishmaniasis: Relationships between clinical status, humoral immune response, haematology and Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis infectivity

A. P. da Costa-Val, R. R. Cavalcanti, N. D. F. Gontijo, M. S. M. Michalick, Bruce Alexander, P. Williams, M. N. Melo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main source of Leishmania infantum infection in humans is a naturally infected dog. This study reports on the infectivity to phle-botomine sandflies (Lutzomyia longipalpis) of serologically positive mongrel dogs that differed in clinical status, haematology and humoral responses to immunoglobulin (Ig) G(T) (total anti-Leishmania IgG). IgG(1) and IgG(2) subclasses of antibody to crude antigen of L. infantum. Forty-five female L. longipalpis were allowed to feed directly on the ears of dogs classified as asymptomatic, oligosymp-tomatic or symptomatic before being dissected five days later. Promastigotes were detected in 88% of the dissected sandflies. The highest rate of infectivity to sandflies was found in symptomatic dogs, followed by oligo symptomatic and asymptomatic animals. The results suggest that dogs naturally infected with L. infantum with higher total IgG and IgG(2) concentrations and lower haematocrit levels were able to infect the highest proportion of L. longipalpis. No correlation was observed between anaemia and the intensity of clinical signs. Symptomatic dogs presented the highest infection rate and intensity of infection. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-643
Number of pages8
JournalVeterinary Journal
Volume174
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2007

Keywords

  • Canine visceral leishmaniasis
  • Clinical status
  • Haematology
  • IgG
  • Xenodiagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Canine visceral leishmaniasis: Relationships between clinical status, humoral immune response, haematology and Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis infectivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this