Are systematic reviews taking heterogeneity into account? An analysis from the infectious diseases module of the Cochrane Library

Seokyung Hahn; Paul Garner; Paula Williamson

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x

Are systematic reviews taking heterogeneity into account? An analysis from the infectious diseases module of the Cochrane Library

Seokyung Hahn, Paul Garner, Paula Williamson

Clinical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	231-233
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume	6
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2000

Keywords

Heterogeneity
Meta-analysis
Systematic review

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x

Cite this

@article{8fa93f0e878240fdbe48cec73c528b57,

title = "Are systematic reviews taking heterogeneity into account? An analysis from the infectious diseases module of the Cochrane Library",

keywords = "Heterogeneity, Meta-analysis, Systematic review",

author = "Seokyung Hahn and Paul Garner and Paula Williamson",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "231--233",

journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",

issn = "1356-1294",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are systematic reviews taking heterogeneity into account? An analysis from the infectious diseases module of the Cochrane Library

AU - Hahn, Seokyung

AU - Garner, Paul

AU - Williamson, Paula

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Systematic review

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00230.x

M3 - Article

SN - 1356-1294

VL - 6

SP - 231

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

IS - 2

ER -