Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analyzing the equity of public primary care provision in Kenya: Variation in facility characteristics by local poverty level

  • Mitsuru Toda
  • , Antony Opwora
  • , Evelyn Waweru
  • , Abdisalan Noor
  • , Tansy Edwards
  • , Greg Fegan
  • , Catherine Molyneux
  • , Catherine Goodman
  • Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobi
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • University of Oxford
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. Equitable access to health care is a key health systems goal, and is a particular concern in low-income countries. In Kenya, public facilities are an important resource for the poor, but little is known on the equity of service provision. This paper assesses whether poorer areas have poorer health services by investigating associations between public facility characteristics and the poverty level of the area in which the facility is located.

 Methods. Data on facility characteristics were collected from a nationally representative sample of public health centers and dispensaries across all 8 provinces in Kenya. A two-stage cluster randomized sampling process was used to select facilities. Univariate associations between facility characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES) of the area in which the facility was located were assessed using chi-squared tests, equity ratios and concentration indices. Indirectly standardized concentration indices were used to assess the influence of SES on facility inputs and service availability while controlling for facility type, province, and remoteness. Results: For most indicators, we found no indication of variation by SES. The clear exceptions were electricity and laboratory services which showed evidence of pro-rich inequalities, with equity ratios of 3.16 and 3.43, concentration indices of 0.09 (p<0.01) and 0.05 (p=0.01), and indirectly standardized concentration ratios of 0.07 (p<0.01) and 0.05 (p=0.01). There were also some indications of pro-rich inequalities for availability of drugs and qualified staff. The lack of evidence of inequality for other indicators does not imply that availability of inputs and services was invariably high; for example, while availability was close to 90% for water supply and family planning services, under half of facilities offered delivery services or outreach. 

Conclusions: The paper shows how local area poverty data can be combined with national health facility surveys, providing a tool for policy makers to assess the equity of input and service availability. There was little evidence of inequalities for most inputs and services, with the clear exceptions of electricity and laboratory services. However, efforts are required to improve the availability of key inputs and services across public facilities in all areas, regardless of SES.

Original languageEnglish
Article number75
JournalInternational Journal for Equity in Health
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  3. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Access
  • Facility characteristics
  • Health equity
  • Kenya
  • Poverty
  • Primary care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyzing the equity of public primary care provision in Kenya: Variation in facility characteristics by local poverty level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this