Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ADJUVANT Randomized Controlled Trial Rationale and Design

  • behalf of the ADJUVANT investigators
  • , Hongfei Sang
  • , Zhilin Zheng
  • , Heng Ni
  • , Xin Gu
  • , Wenqing Xia
  • , Huan Huang
  • , Keqin Liu
  • , Yongji Zhou
  • , Lin Jiang
  • , Lingfei Li
  • , Guangxiong Yuan
  • , Tao Cui
  • , Shunfu Jiang
  • , Yanling Li
  • , Yiqing Jiang
  • , Xing Fang
  • , Xianjun Huang
  • , Mingchao Li
  • , Fei Liu
  • Caixiu Lin, Xuemei Fan, Danyu Feng, Lingling Zhang, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Gregory W. Albers, Raul G. Nogueira, Thanh N. Nguyen, Duolao Wang, Jeffrey L. Saver, Qingwu Yang, Zhongming Qiu, Congguo Yin
  • Westlake University
  • Zhejiang University
  • Xiangtan Central Hospital
  • Taihe County People's Hospital
  • Jingdezhen No. 1 People's Hospital
  • Shenqiu County People’s Hospital
  • Wenzhou Medical University
  • Wannan Medical College
  • The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
  • Beilun District People’s Hospital
  • University of Melbourne
  • Stanford University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Boston University
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Army Medical University
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
  • No. 903 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Force

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a first-line recommended strategy for thrombolysis-eligible patients with stroke due to acute large-vessel occlusion. Tirofiban, one of the most used glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, has been increasingly advocated to counteract different stages of thrombosis mediated by activated platelets. It is unclear whether tirofiban could be used as an alternative to thrombolysis as adjuvant medicine for EVT. This trial aims to assess whether intravenous tirofiban plus EVT is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis bridging with EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion who are eligible for thrombolysis. 

METHODS: ADJUVANT (Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Thrombolysis Before Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial with blinded end point assessment conducted at 42 thrombectomy-capable centers in China. This trial will randomize 976 thrombolysis-eligible stroke patients with confirmed occlusion of the internal carotid artery, M1/M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery, or basilar artery in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous tirofiban plus EVT or intravenous thrombolysis bridging with EVT. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome is functional independence, defined as a score of 0 to 2 on the modified Rankin scale, at 90 days. Safety outcomes are symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours and death within 90 days. 

CONCLUSIONS: ADJUVANT will provide unique information about the efficacy and safety of adjuvant intravenous tirofiban before EVT in thrombolysis-eligible patients with stroke due to acute large-vessel occlusion.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere045967
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume15
Issue number6
Early online date4 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • endovascular thrombectomy
  • intravenous thrombolysis
  • ischemic stroke
  • protocol
  • randomized trial
  • tirofiban

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ADJUVANT Randomized Controlled Trial Rationale and Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this