A survey of healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain relief in labor for women in Ethiopia

Mary McCauley, Catriona Stewart, Birhanu Kebede

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes to the need for pain relief for women in labor.

METHODS: A structured questionnaire (n = 200) distributed to healthcare providers working in the obstetric departments, including theatres, of three public hospitals in different settings (rural, peri-urban and urban) in Ethiopia. Descriptive analysis was performed using Excel 2013 and SPSS version 22 for associations.

RESULTS: The response rate was 81.5% with 164 questionnaires completed. The majority, 79% of respondents, understood that women can feel moderate to severe pain in labor and 77% were of the opinion that labor pain should be relieved. However, common practices included only supportive measures such as breathing and relaxation exercises, back massage and support from family. The general attitude of healthcare providers is that labor is a natural process, women should be able to cope and that pain relief is not a priority for women in labor. More than half, 52% of healthcare providers had safety concerns with using pharmacological methods to relieve pain in labor.

CONCLUSION: The majority of healthcare providers understand that women suffer significant pain during labor. However, providing effective pain relief is currently not provided as part of routine intra-partum care in Ethiopia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number56
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date7 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Awareness
  • Ethiopia
  • Healthcare providers
  • Labor
  • Pain relief

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A survey of healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain relief in labor for women in Ethiopia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this