A public health approach to addressing and preventing misdiagnosis in the scale-up of HIV rapid testing programmes.

Cheryl C. Johnson, Shona Dalal, Rachel Baggaley, Miriam Taegtmeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The global impact of the scale-up HIV testing and treatment has been impressive. In 2015, approximately 60% of people with HIV worldwide were aware of their status [1]. As a result by the end of 2015, 17 million people with HIV were on treatment, and global treatment coverage reached 46% [1]. HIV testing and treatment have reduced AIDS-related deaths by 43% since 2003 [1,2]. In order to further increase impact and improve health outcomes, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all people with HIV regardless of disease status [3]. These calls to continue scale-up of testing and treatment and to achieve the United Nation’s (UN) “90-90-90” targets remain a global priority. Achieving the “first 90” by reaching people with HIV who have yet to be diagnosed, and linking them to treatment as early as possible, is a critical first step.

Degrees of uncertainty exist with all medical testing and diagnoses; in the field of HIV, advances in diagnostic test technology have made testing accurate and reliable. WHO prequalified HIV rapid diagnostic tests all have a sensitivity of ≥99% and specificity ≥98% and are accurate when used correctly in a validated national algorithm. A large number of tests are conducted every year. Although a degree of error and misdiagnosis can be expected, very few cases of false negative and false positive diagnoses have been reported [4–12]. This lack of reporting on testing error and misdiagnoses is not unique to HIV [13–16]. Publication bias and concerns about programme reputation may have contributed to low reporting of misdiagnosis and limit the open discussion required to address errors systematically [16].

To further investigate diagnostic error, determine common causes, and identify potential ways to address misdiagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings, WHO, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) held a symposium to address the social, public health, human rights, ethical and legal implications of misdiagnosis of HIV status [17]. This special issue of the Journal of the International AIDS Society follows this symposium by focusing on the individual and public health implications of HIV misdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number22190
Pages (from-to)e22190
JournalJournal of the International AIDS Society
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Diagnostic
  • HIV
  • Misclassification
  • Misdiagnosis
  • Quality
  • Rapid diagnostic test
  • Test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A public health approach to addressing and preventing misdiagnosis in the scale-up of HIV rapid testing programmes.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this