Abstract
Research in emergency medical care is challenging due to a limited therapeutic window for intervention, which may compromise informed consent. “Deferred consent” allows initiation of study procedures before full consent is recorded. We conducted a formative qualitative study exploring perspectives on deferred consent in Malawi among research ethics committee members, health care professionals, and lay representatives. Participants identified several advantages of deferred consent including scientific value and potential health benefits to the study subjects and wider population. Participants also had concerns, including regulatory barriers and the risk of abuse and malpractice. Conditions affecting acceptability are related to the role of proxies, the nature of the research, the availability of robust regulatory oversight, and the need for community engagement. Our findings show deferred consent would be acceptable in Malawi, provided that a clear case can be made to advance medical knowledge and that adequate regulatory and ethical protections are in place.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 318-327 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 8 Aug 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Keywords
- acceptability
- deferred consent
- emergency care research
- Malawi