2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe

Nynke van den Broek; Thidar Pyone; Helen Owolabi; Stephen Munjanja; Margaret Caffrey; Michael Lijdsman; Sarah White; Siv Steffen Nygaard

2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe

Nynke van den Broek, Thidar Pyone, Helen Owolabi, Stephen Munjanja, Margaret Caffrey, Michael Lijdsman, Sarah White, Siv Steffen Nygaard

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

With the aim to continuously improve transparency and use of evaluation, UNICEF Evaluation Office manages the "Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS)". Within this system, an external independent company reviews and rates all evaluation reports. The quality rating scale for evaluation reports is as follows: “Highly Satisfactory”, “Satisfactory”, “Fair” or “Unsatisfactory”. You will find the link to the quality rating below, labelled as ‘Part 3’ of the report, and the executive feedback summary labelled as 'Part 4'.

Original language	English
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 10 Oct 2016

Access to Document

Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe Unicef 2016 ReportFinal published version, 1.74 MB
Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe Unicef 2016 part 2Final published version, 8.28 MB
Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe Unicef 2016 part 3Final published version, 306 KB
Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe Unicef 2016 part 4Final published version, 30.1 KB

Cite this

@techreport{a13da0e3f9db4faf9e9e36e4e3015672,

title = "2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe",

abstract = "With the aim to continuously improve transparency and use of evaluation, UNICEF Evaluation Office manages the {"}Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS){"}. Within this system, an external independent company reviews and rates all evaluation reports. The quality rating scale for evaluation reports is as follows: “Highly Satisfactory”, “Satisfactory”, “Fair” or “Unsatisfactory”. You will find the link to the quality rating below, labelled as {\textquoteleft}Part 3{\textquoteright} of the report, and the executive feedback summary labelled as 'Part 4'.",

author = "\{van den Broek\}, Nynke and Thidar Pyone and Helen Owolabi and Stephen Munjanja and Margaret Caffrey and Michael Lijdsman and Sarah White and Nygaard, \{Siv Steffen\}",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "10",

language = "English",

type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - 2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe

AU - van den Broek, Nynke

AU - Pyone, Thidar

AU - Owolabi, Helen

AU - Munjanja, Stephen

AU - Caffrey, Margaret

AU - Lijdsman, Michael

AU - White, Sarah

AU - Nygaard, Siv Steffen

PY - 2016/10/10

Y1 - 2016/10/10

N2 - With the aim to continuously improve transparency and use of evaluation, UNICEF Evaluation Office manages the "Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS)". Within this system, an external independent company reviews and rates all evaluation reports. The quality rating scale for evaluation reports is as follows: “Highly Satisfactory”, “Satisfactory”, “Fair” or “Unsatisfactory”. You will find the link to the quality rating below, labelled as ‘Part 3’ of the report, and the executive feedback summary labelled as 'Part 4'.

AB - With the aim to continuously improve transparency and use of evaluation, UNICEF Evaluation Office manages the "Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS)". Within this system, an external independent company reviews and rates all evaluation reports. The quality rating scale for evaluation reports is as follows: “Highly Satisfactory”, “Satisfactory”, “Fair” or “Unsatisfactory”. You will find the link to the quality rating below, labelled as ‘Part 3’ of the report, and the executive feedback summary labelled as 'Part 4'.

M3 - Working paper

BT - 2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe

ER -

2016 Zimbabwe: Independent Evaluation of the Health Transition Fund in Zimbabwe

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this